Bill Fitzhenry's Thoughts For Today…
Understanding important truths
from the Bible….
Sin And Death
Ephesians 2:1-2 NASB
And
you were dead in your trespasses and sins,
2
in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world,
according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now
working in the sons of disobedience.
I have been a Christian for fifty
years. In the summer of 1963 I made a
deliberate choice. I, being informed
from a book that was representative of John Calvin’s doctrine, Calvin’s
Calvinism, resolutely decided this was what the Bible teaches. In the forty-nine years since that time I
have not found any other way that can represent the doctrine of Scripture.
I wrestled with what is known as “Limited
Atonement,” in the light of particular Scriptures. I also had problems with “Irrestible Grace”
philosophically. Over time, not a long
period, I came to see the truths in these doctrines and have a full agreement
with them.
But there was something that became increasingly
apparent by both those who agreed and those who disagreed. The truth concerning God and salvation can be
understood only to the degree that man’s sinfulness as the Bible represents it,
is accepted.
There are two books I read early along that
left a lasting impression on me.
Luther’s Bondage of The Will and Thomas Boston’s Fourfold
State of Man. Both authors centered
their understanding of man upon his fall into sin and the consequences.
Luther stated as the main issue about man
and salvation is man’s loss of any free will as he lives prior to
conversion. Is he responsible - yes. Is he free to affect a change in himself
toward God or His law - no.
Boston showed man to be so radically evil
in his nature that any change to the good must come from without. Both would take Romans 8:7-8 as a statement
to this affect.
7
because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not
subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so,
8
and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
The question then before Election,.
Atonement, or Irresistible Grace is how dead is dead? Or just what does Ephesians 1:1-2 say?
- This is directed toward believers. “You”,
those he will later describe in Vs 5 are the ones addressed. So to begin Paul states as the history
of all believers or more correctly according to Vs 5 those who “by grace have been saved”, that they
have been “dead”.
- There is an active condition in which the deadness abides, “in your trespasses and sin”,
- This deadness is productive. “You formerly walked,” is descriptive of what the deadness produces. This person who is described is active in malignant opposition to God and indulgent in every manner of sinful activity.
If this was the only description of man’s
depraved separation from God, a way might be found to excuse it. But it is ordinary in the Biblical description
of the unconverted. To deny this is to
be forced to resort to something other than Scripture. Man in the Scripture required radical
renovation. This is called regeneration,
a new birth, a new creation, a new man, and there is never any explanation for
this renovation separate from God’s sovereign intervention.
Titus
3:5
5
He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in
righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing
by the Holy Spirit,
John 1:13 places man’s need in such a clear
light that any who deny the necessity of a sovereign unilateral intervention must
either delete or deny the truth that is there.
13
who were ]born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor
of the will of man, but of God.
John states in 1:13 “Who were born”, that is those who have exercised saving faith, “not of” and he names every method man
can claim. Not by inheritance; not by human priestly action; nor by the
human will or free will. It can’t be his by nature; another cannot do it for
him; and he can’t do it for himself.
Then he places an adversative, “but” those means already named being
ineffectual, there is something or someone who is effectual, “born of God”. If any of the other means work God is not
necessary. He can inherit salvation as
the Jew thought he would. He can be
circumcised, baptized, confessed, catechized, or given communion by another
man. He can exercise his will to
change. He can see his need. He can feel his deficiency. He can make a profession, walk the aisle,
meet every requirement of any church, but until God he is dead and undone.
I read one who said that a child is not a
sinner under the condemnation that I just stated until he gets old enough to
knowingly sin. In other words he becomes
a sinner by sinning.
First that you know what this is - it is a
doctrine known as Pelagianism, condemned by the Church in the 5th
century. Secondly, there is a simple
question to be answered. If babies are
not sinners why do they die? The Bible
gives one reason for death, Romans 5:12.
That reason is sin. No sin – no death. Where there is sin, there is death.
12
Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death
through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned—
All the truth of Grace follows from this.
Hello Mr Bill - Glad to see you back online. I've missed your blog.
ReplyDeleteGreat post today, and right on the money. You make it absolutely clear that we cannot choose God, but God chooses us; and that our freedom to choose Him in return is subsequent and consequent to that. Very well spoken.
In regard to your comment about man being "circumcised, baptized, confessed, catechized, or given communion by another man", I would just like to ask for clarification. These acts of man, involving earthly water, oils, etc., can obviously have no spiritual effect or value in and of themselves. To suggest that would be to say that man himself can be a source of grace, which is ridiculous. But since God has asked us to go forth and act in His name (being the branches off Himself the vine; or the members of the body where He is the head; etc.), it seems clear that He desires to act through us. Is it possible that He could freely choose to transmit His own grace through these earthly acts of man?
The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines a "sacrament" as "an outward sign of inward grace", and obviously the man is only able to effect the outward sign. But why couldn't God choose that vehicle for communicating His own inward grace?
Thanks again for posting, and have a great day!